This article is the first chapter of Measuring the Mandates: Questioning the State’s Response to COVID-19. The full book is available here. ‘Democide means for governments what murder means for an individual under municipal law. It is the premeditated killing of a person in cold blood, or causing the death of a person through reckless and wanton disregard for their life.’
If the virus had been spreading for months before the lockdowns (which my research proves is an almost-certainty), we would have seen some of these massive "all-cause" death spikes in numerous countries, states or cities weeks or months before these spikes.
The official narrative is that we actually had "late spread" (in the Spring of 2020), which caused the sudden explosion in deaths in multiple locations all at essentially the same time. I think most thinking people now agree this (very contagious) virus was spreading by November 2019 (if not October or September). But the deaths didn't start happening until mid to late March 2020? Coincidentally, right after all the medical protocols changed.
The average time from infection to death is about 17 to 19 days. So if many people were getting sick in, say, December 2019 - the deaths would have started showing up in late December or maybe early January. But as these charts show, there was no noticeable spike in deaths.
This was a form of government/bureaucrat caused homicide ... on a massive scale.
The only medical homicide in history that was bigger was a year later ... when the same people and governments mandated the Covid shots.
That is, the government killed massive numbers of people ... in 2 different ways. And this doesn't include the "collateral" deaths from the lockdowns. So I guess that would be the mass death trifecta.
An average person cannot go without water for more than about 7 days. An elderly person might not go more than 5. That fits within the 17 - 19 day "infection (if it was an infection" and death.
And I didn't mention the fourth cause of deaths - Covid itself, which did kill people (not nearly as many as we've been told) and made many millions sick, some very sick.
Imagine the uproar if a parallel program to, let's imagine, wipe out all the k-9s on the planet by some modified K-9 viral scenario. There would be an ARMY of civilians ready to KILL and demanding answers before the lynching began.
But here, we have a FAR more serious condition in the laps of the inhabitants of planet earth, and there is not a single plowshare having been formed into a sword.
If governments panicked and blew up every single flu epidemic, human kind would be extinct. If they had treated it like every other flu, there would probably not have been any excess deaths
Thanks Bill for reposting this article. I have been looking for someones research on the iatrogenic deaths for over a year. This is a great explanation!
If the virus had been spreading for months before the lockdowns (which my research proves is an almost-certainty), we would have seen some of these massive "all-cause" death spikes in numerous countries, states or cities weeks or months before these spikes.
The official narrative is that we actually had "late spread" (in the Spring of 2020), which caused the sudden explosion in deaths in multiple locations all at essentially the same time. I think most thinking people now agree this (very contagious) virus was spreading by November 2019 (if not October or September). But the deaths didn't start happening until mid to late March 2020? Coincidentally, right after all the medical protocols changed.
The average time from infection to death is about 17 to 19 days. So if many people were getting sick in, say, December 2019 - the deaths would have started showing up in late December or maybe early January. But as these charts show, there was no noticeable spike in deaths.
This was a form of government/bureaucrat caused homicide ... on a massive scale.
The only medical homicide in history that was bigger was a year later ... when the same people and governments mandated the Covid shots.
That is, the government killed massive numbers of people ... in 2 different ways. And this doesn't include the "collateral" deaths from the lockdowns. So I guess that would be the mass death trifecta.
An average person cannot go without water for more than about 7 days. An elderly person might not go more than 5. That fits within the 17 - 19 day "infection (if it was an infection" and death.
And I didn't mention the fourth cause of deaths - Covid itself, which did kill people (not nearly as many as we've been told) and made many millions sick, some very sick.
Imagine the uproar if a parallel program to, let's imagine, wipe out all the k-9s on the planet by some modified K-9 viral scenario. There would be an ARMY of civilians ready to KILL and demanding answers before the lynching began.
But here, we have a FAR more serious condition in the laps of the inhabitants of planet earth, and there is not a single plowshare having been formed into a sword.
This is a peculiar thing, from my point of view!
R.
If governments panicked and blew up every single flu epidemic, human kind would be extinct. If they had treated it like every other flu, there would probably not have been any excess deaths
Thanks Bill for reposting this article. I have been looking for someones research on the iatrogenic deaths for over a year. This is a great explanation!
I’m posting this on Quora. There’s a huge audience there.
Thank you very much. If you could share a link with me I'd appreciate it
https://choicenotcoercion.quora.com/An-excellent-article-on-the-Covid-con-and-the-appalling-deaths-in-Old-Peoples-homes-which-were-classed-as-Covid-deaths?ch=17&oid=165411274&share=3fff16c8&srid=34AtJa&target_type=post
It needs time to pick up. Ill pop it up on other spaces.
Outstanding, Richard. Jeffrey Tucker posted a link of this at our Brownstone Writer's Group and so I revisited it. Hope you are doing well.
Excellent post. Bill Rice’s point about early spread of the virus in September-November of 2019 makes the graphs and points even more salient.